Category: Blog

I was watching Mona Lisa Smile last night, there is a struggle between the rigid structure and a progressive teacher. The students, trained in art history, view art as a checklist. They measure greatness by technique, historical significance, and academic consensus.

But the teacher (Katherine), asks them to stop thinking and just look. This raises the same question we spiral into, Is art objective (a science) or subjective (a feeling)? I have written few pieces on how it is subjective, but diving into different perspective today.

The Objectivity

Let’s start with a question. Is a toddler’s drawing of a cat or my own oil pastel tulips (forgive me) worse than Van Gogh’s Starry Night?

Technically? Maybe. But emotionally? To a stranger, the toddler’s drawing is scratch marks. To the toddler’s mother that drawing might evoke a deeper emotional response than any Van Gogh ever could. The value of the art changes entirely based on who is looking at it.

Van Gogh isn’t objectively better. Van Gogh is just intersubjectively validated. Intersubjective means that millions of us have agreed that his work carries meaning. We have built a consensus. But consensus is not the same thing as objective truth. It’s just a shared opinion.

Where Philosophy meets Biology

If art is subjective, why do 99% of humans agree that a tulips are beautiful? Fine, let’s take rose as an example. I recently found myself debating the ghost of the philosopher George Berkeley. Berkeley famously argued that “to be is to be perceived.” He might argue that the rose is beautiful to all of us because we are all tuning into a universal broadcast (God/universe).

• Symmetry = health in nature.
• Vibrant Red = ripe fruit and survival to our primate brains

This universal beauty isn’t art. it’s instinct/programming/conditioning. Agreeing that a rose is pretty doesn’t make us art critics. It just makes us human. If an alien species evolved on a planet where red meant poison and symmetry meant predator, they would look at our rose and recoil in horror. The rose isn’t objectively beautiful. It’s only beautiful to us.

But what if I paint a burning rose? Or a decaying rose Or a black rose ?

• One viewer might see the burning rose as a symbol of passion.
• Another might see it as a symbol of destruction and climate change.
• A third might see it as liberation from tradition.

The rose hasn’t changed. The viewer has brought your own life, your own experiences, and your own hope to the canvas.

The Gap: Where Art Actually Lives

If there is no objective standard, does art lose its meaning? On the contrary. It gains it.

• The Encoding: The artist feels something (grief, rage, hope) and tries to lock that feeling into a physical object (paint, clay, sound).
• The Gap: The object sits there, silent.
• The Decoding: You, the viewer, look at the object. You unlock it using your own life keys of experiences, trauma, joy, culture and more.

Art lives in the gap. It lives in the space between what the artist intended and what you perceive. The artist provides the prompt; you provide the meaning.

Intersubjective Space

The burning rose works because of shared cultural knowledge.

• Rose = beauty/romance (cultural agreement, not biological fact)
• Fire = destruction/passion (agreed symbolism)
• Paint on canvas = Art (consensus that this deserves attention)

This is consensus reality. It’s not true because of physics; it’s true because we’re all telling the same story together. Art needs both the shared language (intersubjective) and your personal translation (subjective).

The Knowledge Paradox

Knowledge doesn’t make art objective, but it makes your subjectivity richer. If you look at a painting knowing nothing, you feel something. If you look at a painting knowing the history, the symbolism, and the artist’s life, you feel more.

The Art is Subjective. The emotional impact of the “why” is entirely up to the us. The artist can only create the bridge. They use their skills to encode an emotion into an object.

Katherine was right. You can learn everything about the paint, the canvas, and the date it was made. But until you decide how it makes you feel, you haven’t actually seen the art. You’ve only seen the object.

There is no single answer in art. There is only the artist’s intention and your interpretation and the art lives in the space between them.

Cheers

PS: Not sure if I made sense

Check out the previous post: Paradox of Growth and Stability

Follow on IG & X for more!

If you like what you see and wish to support my work, then

Share your thoughts/suggestion at the comment section or mail at

randomwhyss[@]gmail[dot]com

Don’t miss out! Get notified about new blog posts straight to your inbox !

(No spam, pinky promise!)

Enter your mail to receive updates

For the last few days, I’ve been stuck on a paradox that feels central to life right now. The tension between growth and stability. Earlier, my confusion was about growth versus solitude. That was simpler. Solitude is a condition, you can enter or exit it. But this one is harder. This one sits at the core of how life actually moves.

Some part of us always craves growth, new skills, new versions of ourselves, new territories to explore. Transformation has its own high. But everything we call “growth” comes with a cost, and that cost is almost always stability.

Growth demands motion. Stability demands stillness. And the human mind wants both.

I’ve been trying to understand whether this tension maps to the idea of maximizers vs. satisfiers. Maybe it does, maybe it doesn’t. The distinction isn’t helping me reach a conclusion. What I can see clearly is this, when your soul craves growth, stability becomes a by-product. You get it only after a phase shift, never during it.

Stability isn’t the companion of growth, it’s the outcome of a growth cycle. You build, you stretch, you break patterns, you endure discomfort, and then you land. That “landing” feels like stability, but it is temporary. Because after some time, the soul asks again, What’s next?

So the question isn’t “Can we blend growth and stability?” The question is Which phase are we in? Cocoon or the butterfly?

If the soul is restless, chasing stability is pointless. If the soul is tired, forcing growth is counterproductive.

Maybe the real skill is learning to switch, knowing when to step into expansion and when to sit inside equilibrium. Not trying to merge them into one perfect formula, but letting life run in cycles. Because growth is movement. Stability is the pause. Both are necessary but not at the same time.

How do you see and handle this ?

Cheers

Check out the previous post: Perspective Shift!

Follow on IG & X for more!

If you like what you see and wish to support my work, then

Share your thoughts/suggestion at the comment section or mail at

randomwhyss[@]gmail[dot]com

Don’t miss out! Get notified about new blog posts straight to your inbox !

(No spam, pinky promise!)

Enter your mail to receive updates

We often get stuck because we keep looking at a situation from only one angle. When a problem refuses to move, it’s usually not the problem but it’s our perspective. A single viewpoint creates a loop. We keep circling the same thoughts and eventually confuse repetition for clarity.

The way out is simple is to shift the angle/view point.

A different lens can reveal a detail we missed, a pattern we didn’t notice, or an option we never considered. And if you can’t find that shift on your own, borrow someone else’s eyes. A close friend or family member can often spot in seconds what we overlook for weeks.

It’s a lot easier to say than to practice. Change doesn’t need force, it needs a different viewpoint.

Cheers

Check out the previous post: Systems

Follow on IG & X for more!

If you like what you see and wish to support my work, then

Share your thoughts/suggestion at the comment section or mail at

randomwhyss[@]gmail[dot]com

Don’t miss out! Get notified about new blog posts straight to your inbox !

(No spam, pinky promise!)

Enter your mail to receive updates

Two years ago, I bought a flip flop. Simple, and comfortable. It fit into almost everything I wore and felt easy to walk in. For a while, it was my go to choice.

But comfort has a way of disguising friction. If you walk too long in the wrong fit, it doesn’t hurt immediately, it dulls your awareness first. This one didn’t tear, my skin did. The material stayed strong, while my legs slowly adjusted to the pain until they couldn’t anymore.

That’s how attachment often works. You stop questioning what you’ve adapted to, mistaking endurance for stability. You only realize the damage when it begins to limit your movement.

Sometimes, the hardest part isn’t letting go but in recognizing what’s quietly hurting you while still appearing functional.

Decluttering isn’t an act of loss. It’s a return to alignment. The flip flop was fine. It just wasn’t right anymore.

Cheers!

Check out the previous post: Do tulips know they’re red?

Follow on IG & X for more!

If you like what you see and wish to support my work, then

Share your thoughts/suggestion at the comment section or mail at

randomwhyss[@]gmail[dot]com

Don’t miss out! Get notified about new blog posts straight to your inbox !

(No spam, pinky promise!)

Enter your mail to receive updates

I was blending oil pastels yesterday watching colors turn into new colors I didn’t expect. Something about that transformation felt pure. Like beauty appearing out of nothing. it felt nice.

Then the book I’m reading (Three Dialogues between Hylas and Philonous) messed with my peace.

It argued that color doesn’t exist outside the mind. Shape doesn’t either. Not even the tulip we’re so sure is real. What we see is the brain’s version of reality…not reality itself.

I looked at my sketch again. Was the beauty on the paper? Or inside me?

Neuroscience agrees with the philosophers: the world doesn’t arrive fully formed. The brain builds it light into color, vibration into sound, memory into meaning. We think we’re observing the world. Really, we’re constructing it.

Perception is a controlled hallucination – Anil seth

And yet, almost everyone finds a rose beautiful. Maybe because life taught us to notice color that meant food, symmetry that meant safety, softness that meant care. Maybe what we call “beautiful” is evolution and emotion agreeing on the same picture.

The strange part? The brain is both the creator and the admirer, designing the illusion and then falling for it. A blank page becomes a world, if the mind decides so.

Maybe reality isn’t something we find. Maybe it’s something we make color by color, meaning by meaning, right inside the head that wonders about it.

So… what is a tulip’s color really then?

Cheers

PS: Tulips from my collection of pastels

Check out the previous post: Passionate about other People’s Passion!

Follow on IG & X for more!

If you like what you see and wish to support my work, then

Share your thoughts/suggestion at the comment section or mail at

randomwhyss[@]gmail[dot]com

Don’t miss out! Get notified about new blog posts straight to your inbox !

(No spam, pinky promise!)

Enter your mail to receive updates

Recently, I’ve heard people say they’re passionate about other people’s passion. At first, I assumed it was just another form of mimetic desire, wanting what others want. But it’s not. It’s something subtler.

We are always been drawn to people who come alive when they talk about what they love, the way their eyes shift, their tone deepens, their whole body syncs to that one thing. You can feel their pulse in their words.

It’s not that I want to do what they do. It’s that I’m fascinated by the flow state they’re in. That flow where time dissolves, where they merge with what they’re doing. That aliveness is magnetic.

What draws us isn’t their craft. It’s the clarity that comes when purpose and presence align. It reminds you that somewhere within us, we also have something that could make us feel that alive.

Being passionate about other people’s passion isn’t imitation. It’s resonance. You’re not chasing their path but you’re remembering your own capacity for depth.

Let others’ passions remind you that aliveness is contagious, not competitive.

Cheers

Check out the previous post: Stillness and the Void!

Follow on IG & X for more!

If you like what you see and wish to support my work, then

Share your thoughts/suggestion at the comment section or mail at

randomwhyss[@]gmail[dot]com

Don’t miss out! Get notified about new blog posts straight to your inbox !

(No spam, pinky promise!)

Enter your mail to receive updates

Yesterday, I found myself in a long conversation about everything career, money, love, success, failure, marriage, children, routines, health, rest and what not. Somewhere between all those words, I realized how much of life we build to escape something deeper, the quiet space inside us that has no clear/definite answer.

Maybe all these pursuits are ways to keep ourselves entertained, to avoid the weight of that silence/void within us. We chase goals, ideas, people, and meanings not because they will complete us, but because they keep the void at bay.

The irony is, our brain feels rewarded not when it finds the answer, but when it searches for one. We are wired to seek, not to rest. The mind keeps running, chasing afraid that if it stops, it will disappear into nothingness/abyss.

But what if that nothingness isn’t as empty as it seems?

The more I observed, the more I felt that self-awareness is not an escape from the void. It’s a doorway into it. You begin to notice how your mind rushes to fill every silence. Be it with people, work or hobbies. Awareness doesn’t instantly bring peace; it just shows you the mechanism. Yet, once you see it, you can’t unsee it.

Stillness, I think, is what happens when you stop fighting that void. It’s not about silencing your thoughts or meditating endlessly or giving up curiosity. it’s about allowing the silence to exist without fear. The void remains, but your resistance softens.

And then something shifts. The same space that once felt unbearable begins to feel light. The emptiness turns into a kind of quiet peace.

When the self stops searching for peace, the absence of that search is peace.

The void becomes peace not because it changes, but because you do. When you stop naming it, judging it, or running from it, what’s left is stillness itself.

Maybe that’s what it means to really know yourself . To become intimate with the void, and to find that peace was never outside of it.

Cheers

Check out the previous post: The Duality of Being!

Follow on IG & X for more!

If you like what you see and wish to support my work, then

Share your thoughts/suggestion at the comment section or mail at

randomwhyss[@]gmail[dot]com

Don’t miss out! Get notified about new blog posts straight to your inbox !

(No spam, pinky promise!)

Enter your mail to receive updates

With the rise of the digital world, staying rooted in the physical one takes intention and effort.

I am trying to follow a simple rule. Limit my internet use. My phone plan runs for three months with limited data. What began as a cost-effective choice slowly turned into a conscious practice. So, when I go out, limited data makes me pause before every click and it filters what truly matters from what’s just noise.

Still, it’s not easy. The internet is stitched into everything. For eg, Google Maps, Strava, UPI, Rapido or even WhatsApp. Even a simple SMS feels like a relic as it exists only for OTPs. I’ve tried cutting digital clues with wallpaper, minimal apps, fewer notifications but complete detachment isn’t realistic. Some days, I am bounded to recharge a one-day data pack and get back online, just to finish something that can’t stay offline.

That’s why I began reaching for hobbies that don’t need gadgets like oil pastels, real books, small hands-on things and trying to meet friends. They remind me that presence has texture/emotion. Still, even they demand a trace of the internet. To share a piece of work, or simply exist in the loop. It can’t be fully avoided.

It’s not exactly friction that the internet creates, but something subtler, a quiet thing with how I experience the world around me. It lowers my in person effectiveness, my ability to stay rooted in what’s real and immediate.

I keep wondering if it’s just me. Or if we’re all, in our own ways, trying to rebuild a life that can balance between being connected and being present.

Cheers!

Check out the previous post: You Have Nothing to Prove!

Follow on IG & X for more!

If you like what you see and wish to support my work, then

Share your thoughts/suggestion at the comment section or mail at

randomwhyss[@]gmail[dot]com

Don’t miss out! Get notified about new blog posts straight to your inbox !

(No spam, pinky promise!)

Enter your mail to receive updates

It might sound absurd, but it’s true. You have nothing to prove to anyone. Not your parents. Not your friends or enemies. Not the people who doubted you.

Every time you do something just to show you’re worthy, you subtly agree with the belief that you weren’t enough to begin with. That’s the trap.

Of course, your role as a parent, a professional, a partner, or a friend demand effort, work, performances and accountability. But effort given from alignment feels different from effort driven by validation. One expands you, the latter exhausts you.

There’s a quote that says,

Don’t become what you hate.

And that’s what proving does, it quietly turns you into the very person whose approval you once craved.

The path forward isn’t to stop caring. It’s to care differently. Do the work because it feels right. Build because it fulfills you. Not to silence doubt but because you no longer need to.

Learn to pause between the stimulus and your response, that brief silence is where power lies. The day your actions stop being reactions, you’re finally free.

Cheers!

PS: maybe to self (that’s a bigger and never ending trap, lol)

Check out the previous post: Follow Your Plan, Not Your Mood! & Dude Movie Review

Follow on IG & X for more!

If you like what you see and wish to support my work, then

Share your thoughts/suggestion at the comment section or mail at

randomwhyss[@]gmail[dot]com

Don’t miss out! Get notified about new blog posts straight to your inbox !

(No spam, pinky promise!)

Enter your mail to receive updates

There’s a quote I once came across that caught my attention few days yet I ignored.

Follow your plan, not your mood.

The truth is, I never really managed to internalize it fully. It’s easy to understand but hard to practice. Following a plan, especially when emotions pull you in different directions, requires willpower or sometimes, a strong reason that reminds you why you started.

There are no playbooks or shortcuts to switch off emotions and instantly operate from your logical brain. It takes conscious effort.

What has worked for me, though, is keeping the end point/result in mind, the satisfaction of seeing the work completed. Sometimes, even creating a little fear of missing out if I don’t stick to the plan helps. It’s a mental nudge that keeps me from drifting.

Over time, this practice slowly builds into a habit. It creates a quiet sense of self-awareness the kind that reminds you that discipline often begins where motivation fades.

Try experimenting with this mindset and see how it works for you.

Cheers

Check out the previous post: What is the Purpose of Life?

Follow on IG & X for more!

If you like what you see and wish to support my work, then

Share your thoughts/suggestion at the comment section or mail at

randomwhyss[@]gmail[dot]com

Don’t miss out! Get notified about new blog posts straight to your inbox !

(No spam, pinky promise!)

Enter your mail to receive updates

Last week, I wrote about randomness and organization how organization always creeps in before randomness even gets a chance to breathe. I’ve been thinking about how this pattern repeats in another pair too! consistency and perfection.

The need for perfection always walks in first, dressed up and confident, and quietly kills the very thing that could have kept the process alive consistency.

I used to walk before just for the sake of it. No numbers, no metrics, no pressure. But the moment I started tracking every calorie and step, I began forcing myself into perfection. It’s strange how quickly a joyful activity can turn into a performance review.

Protecting the goose is more important than chasing the golden egg. Consistency is the goose. Perfection may promise shiny outcomes, but without the quiet, steady act of showing up, there’s nothing left to perfect.

This holds true for anything work, relationships, habits. You have to show up before you optimize.

Cheers!

Check out the previous post: #DecodeAgri19: Why agri graduates lag?

Follow on IG & X for more!

If you like what you see and wish to support my work, then

Share your thoughts/suggestion at the comment section or mail at

randomwhyss[@]gmail[dot]com

Don’t miss out! Get notified about new blog posts straight to your inbox !

(No spam, pinky promise!)

Enter your mail to receive updates

LinkedIn is buzzing with advice that agricultural graduates or the education ciricullam need to adapt to the agri-tech and startup ecosystem. True but slightly misplaced. Most of these students were never built for, nor placed in, that ecosystem.

Reality Check

B.Sc. (Hons) Agriculture is a four-year professional course. Before a decade, it existed almost entirely in government institutes and sub-campuses, private colleges had limited management seats. Students were largely from agri backgrounds or focused on competitive exams like IAS, where the degree offered an edge.

Course content is diverse, but placements were narrow. The seed, fertilizer, and pesticide sectors dominate hiring and favored men for fieldwork and travel. Salaries are modest. Compared to startups or business, exams like UPSC, TNPSC, SSC, Bank SO and more, remain more attractive for stability and pay. Even now.

Digital marketing and the startup boom are changing awareness. Success in agri-business requires the 3 C‘s: confidence, clarity, and capital. Graduates usually have confidence and clarity or the subject expertise but lack exposure to fundraising platforms and problem-solving in business contexts. Agri incubators at sub-campuses and NABARD funding exist, but growth is slow relative to tech.

Two Very Different Paths

Path 1: Tech Entrepreneurs in Agriculture

Building technology products to solve agricultural problems, where entrepreneurship and tech are core. We have few to quite alot now.

Example: soil-testing apps with IoT sensors, AI-based crop disease detection, marketplaces connecting farmers to buyers, raising VC funding and scaling fast.

Skills needed: Coding, product management, pitch decks, microeconomics, growth hacking.

The gap: Agri students haven’t learned coding, SaaS, or fundraising. it’s essentially a career change.

Path 2: Agriculture Experts Leveraging Technology

Deep domain knowledge is core, technology is a tool.

Example: improved farming practices using WhatsApp or simple apps, contract farming networks, value-added agri-products with tech-enabled logistics, and more.

Skills needed: Domain expertise, supply chain, farmer relationships, quality control, and growth.

The gap: Much smaller. Students have expertise; they need exposure to business fundamentals, basic digital tools, and access to working capital.

Why confusion happens?

Path 1 is popularised because it’s visible across all platforms, fits the disruption narrative, and scales theoretically faster. Tech entrepreneurs dominate the market. But most real agricultural impact will come from Path 2: biology, soil, and seasons can’t be hacked. Farmer trust comes from demonstrated expertise. Sustainable margins come from operational excellence, not just platform effects.

Path 2 needs incubators aligned with agricultural cycles (experimentation takes 6–12 months, not weeks), working capital for 3–5 years, mentorship, negotiations, partnerships, and market analysis

Agriculture itself is still largely untapped. Early adopters are entering, with rising focus on health and quality food. Once demand for quality food scales (maybe organic or natural), the sector will explode but unlike tech, it demands multiple stakeholders experts, farmers, labor & land, private tech, policymakers and markets.

The foundation is already there. With more experiential learning and exposure to business models, graduates can bridge traditional education and the emerging agri-economy if the system catches up. Most advice-givers don’t distinguish between the two. They often equate ‘agri-tech’ with tech entrepreneurship, while agriculture also greatly benefits from domain experts who apply technology thoughtfully rather than aiming solely to become startup founders.

Cheers!

Check out the previous post in Agriculture & latest post (The Stage Beyond Independence)

Follow on IG & X for more!

If you like what you see and wish to support my work, then

Share your thoughts/suggestion at the comment section or mail at

randomwhyss[@]gmail[dot]com

Don’t miss out! Get notified about new blog posts straight to your inbox !

(No spam, pinky promise!)

Enter your mail to receive updates

I never got myself introduced to the word interdependence deeply enough. The only words I heard were dependence and independence. Dependence was framed as weakness. Independence was glorified as freedom. No one said there was a third stage, a higher one!

While reading The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People, the stages became clear. Human growth isn’t linear and it evolves through three distinct phases. Dependence → independence → interdependence. Each level demands mastery before the next one can begin. Dependence teaches survival (you do it for me). Independence teaches self-reliance (I can do it myself. Interdependence teaches creation (we can do it better together), the ability to build something larger than oneself.

Most people never move past independence. They confuse self-sufficiency with completion. But independence is still defensive. It’s about proving you don’t need anyone. Interdependence begins as a choice out of independence. At that stage, collaboration stops being transactional. It becomes generative. Win–win kinda strategy. It’s where your competence meets another’s and multiplies. It’s the evolution of independence.

Culture celebrates the lone achiever, not the integrated builder. Yet everything enduring ecosystems, partnerships, systems, nations runs on interdependence. Independence may make you good. Interdependence makes you scalable. Applies to all slices of life.

Cheers!

PS: can we call this as synergistic effect?

Check out the previous post: Randomness and Order

Follow on IG & X for more!

If you like what you see and wish to support my work, then

Share your thoughts/suggestion at the comment section or mail at

randomwhyss[@]gmail[dot]com

Don’t miss out! Get notified about new blog posts straight to your inbox !

(No spam, pinky promise!)

Enter your mail to receive updates